ORA-2.2
A cloud or hosting provider being audited, under ORA 2.2
Offers managed services to third parties as its primary business. The Licensor or Clearinghouse requests supporting documentation. This resolves to the Canopy tier.
Tier
Owed
A quarterly Canopy Report. Section 5.1 imposes a royalty only when the Canopy Licensee makes Production Use.
Sections in play
1.8, 3.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3
Who and what
The situation being resolved.
Actor
A cloud or hosting provider
Offers managed services to third parties as its primary business.
over 2M USD
Situation
Being audited
The Licensor or Clearinghouse requests supporting documentation.
Rulings
3 questions resolved against the text.
Which tier applies?
Canopy. Offers managed services to third parties as its primary business. Section 5.2 reporting applies; the Section 5.1 royalty attaches when the Licensee makes Production Use and only to attributable revenue.
Sections 1.8, 3.1, 5.1
Is anything owed?
A quarterly Canopy Report. Section 5.1 imposes a royalty only when the Canopy Licensee makes Production Use.
Sections 5.1, 5.2
What can an audit actually require?
Documentation once in any twelve month period, absent a documented reason to suspect misstatement. Where such a reason exists, an independent auditor may review under mutual NDA at the requesting party's expense, unless an underpayment above five percent is established, in which case you bear the reasonable cost.
Sections 5.3
Cautions
What this situation gets wrong most often.
Attribution lives in the package manifest under ORA 8.1, not only in documentation, because an agent package is installed by a machine that never reads a directory listing.
Same actor
Other situations for this party.
Non-normative. Where this and the licence text disagree, the licence text applies.