ORD-2.2
A nonprofit or NGO deploying to customer-controlled infrastructure, under ORD 2.2
Charitable or public-benefit organisation, any size. Providing professional services while the customer owns and controls the infrastructure and account. This resolves to the Root tier.
Tier
Owed
Nothing. No fee, no report, no filing.
Sections in play
1.7, 1.9, 2.1, 2.2
Who and what
The situation being resolved.
Actor
A nonprofit or NGO
Charitable or public-benefit organisation, any size.
any
Situation
Deploying to customer-controlled infrastructure
Providing professional services while the customer owns and controls the infrastructure and account.
Rulings
3 questions resolved against the text.
Which tier applies?
Root. Charitable or public-benefit organisation, any size. Below $20,000,000 in trailing revenue, or within an exempt category, no Canopy royalty applies. Sections 4, 6, 8, and 10 still bind every Licensee.
Sections 1.7, 2.1, 2.2
Is anything owed?
Nothing. No fee, no report, no filing.
Sections 2.1
Does this count as Production Use?
Yes. Providing professional services while the customer owns and controls the infrastructure and account. Section 1.9 covers internal operation at operating scope and systems made available externally to customers or the public. Development, testing, evaluation, research, and personal non-revenue use remain outside it.
Sections 1.9
Cautions
What this situation gets wrong most often.
Revenue is measured across entities under common control, per Section 1.4. A parent company above the threshold makes its subsidiary a Canopy Licensee regardless of that subsidiary's own turnover.
Section 8.3 of ORD requires a withdrawal of consent to propagate to any derivative you have distributed. Whether that is operationally achievable at depth is a published open question.
Same actor
Other situations for this party.
Non-normative. Where this and the licence text disagree, the licence text applies.