ORD-2.2
An enterprise listing it in a marketplace, under ORD 2.2
Large organisation with procurement, legal review, and an SBOM process. Listing the Work by name on a multi-provider platform where the customer controls its lifecycle. This resolves to the Canopy tier.
Tier
Owed
0.5% of revenue attributable to products or services that depend on the Work, capped at $250,000 per year, plus a quarterly Canopy Report.
Sections in play
1.8, 1.9, 3.1, 5.1, 5.2
Who and what
The situation being resolved.
Actor
An enterprise
Large organisation with procurement, legal review, and an SBOM process.
over 50M USD
Situation
Listing it in a marketplace
Listing the Work by name on a multi-provider platform where the customer controls its lifecycle.
Rulings
3 questions resolved against the text.
Which tier applies?
Canopy. Large organisation with procurement, legal review, and an SBOM process. Section 5.2 reporting applies; the Section 5.1 royalty attaches when the Licensee makes Production Use and only to attributable revenue.
Sections 1.8, 3.1, 5.1
Is anything owed?
0.5% of revenue attributable to products or services that depend on the Work, capped at $250,000 per year, plus a quarterly Canopy Report.
Sections 5.1, 5.2
Does this count as Production Use?
Yes. Listing the Work by name on a multi-provider platform where the customer controls its lifecycle. Section 1.9 covers internal operation at operating scope and systems made available externally to customers or the public. Development, testing, evaluation, research, and personal non-revenue use remain outside it.
Sections 1.9
Cautions
What this situation gets wrong most often.
Section 8.3 of ORD requires a withdrawal of consent to propagate to any derivative you have distributed. Whether that is operationally achievable at depth is a published open question.
Same actor
Other situations for this party.
Non-normative. Where this and the licence text disagree, the licence text applies.