ORA-2.2
A scale-up above the threshold contributing back, under ORA 2.2
Past the threshold on trailing revenue, now a Canopy Licensee. Sending a patch, an issue, or a defect report upstream. This resolves to the Canopy tier.
Tier
Owed
A quarterly Canopy Report. Section 5.1 imposes a royalty only when the Canopy Licensee makes Production Use.
Sections in play
1.8, 3.1, 5.1, 5.2, 8.2
Who and what
The situation being resolved.
Actor
A scale-up above the threshold
Past the threshold on trailing revenue, now a Canopy Licensee.
20M to 100M USD
Situation
Contributing back
Sending a patch, an issue, or a defect report upstream.
Rulings
3 questions resolved against the text.
Which tier applies?
Canopy. Past the threshold on trailing revenue, now a Canopy Licensee. Section 5.2 reporting applies; the Section 5.1 royalty attaches when the Licensee makes Production Use and only to attributable revenue.
Sections 1.8, 3.1, 5.1
Is anything owed?
A quarterly Canopy Report. Section 5.1 imposes a royalty only when the Canopy Licensee makes Production Use.
Sections 5.1, 5.2
What must a contribution disclose?
That it is your own work, or is appropriately licensed and identified as such, or was produced with the assistance of an AI tool and which tool. Section 8.2 extends this to issues and defect reports, not only code, because the volume problem maintainers face is reports rather than patches.
Sections 8.2
Cautions
What this situation gets wrong most often.
Attribution lives in the package manifest under ORA 8.1, not only in documentation, because an agent package is installed by a machine that never reads a directory listing.
Same actor
Other situations for this party.
Non-normative. Where this and the licence text disagree, the licence text applies.