OpenRoots

ORA-2.2

A government body porting it, under ORA 2.2

Public sector at any level, national through municipal. Commercializing a port whose value still derives substantially from the Work. This resolves to the Root tier.

Tier

Root

Owed

Nothing. No fee, no report, no filing.

Sections in play

1.13, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3

Who and what

The situation being resolved.

Actor

A government body

Public sector at any level, national through municipal.

any

Situation

Porting it

Commercializing a port whose value still derives substantially from the Work.

Rulings

4 questions resolved against the text.

clear

Which tier applies?

Root. Public sector at any level, national through municipal. Below $20,000,000 in trailing revenue, or within an exempt category, no Canopy royalty applies. Sections 4, 6, 8, and 10 still bind every Licensee.

Sections 1.7, 2.1, 2.2

clear

Is anything owed?

Nothing. No fee, no report, no filing.

Sections 2.1

clear

Does this count as Production Use?

Yes. Commercializing a port whose value still derives substantially from the Work. Section 1.9 covers internal operation at operating scope and systems made available externally to customers or the public. Development, testing, evaluation, research, and personal non-revenue use remain outside it.

Sections 1.9

conditional

Is this a Competing Offering?

Yes if the value derives entirely or substantially from the Work itself. Section 4 applies to every Licensee, including Root. A larger independent product remains allowed, but selling, porting, repackaging, hosting, or redistributing the Work as the product requires a separate written agreement.

Sections 1.13, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3

Cautions

What this situation gets wrong most often.

  • Revenue is measured across entities under common control, per Section 1.4. A parent company above the threshold makes its subsidiary a Canopy Licensee regardless of that subsidiary's own turnover.

  • Attribution lives in the package manifest under ORA 8.1, not only in documentation, because an agent package is installed by a machine that never reads a directory listing.

Same actor

Other situations for this party.